I like * Worldwide Webb3. Once we can abbreviate it on Twitter, speaking to just Webb3. We need a name that can be quick to write/speak and enough to understand what we are talking.
Fantastic question.
The shorter the name, the more memorable and shareable.
When shared orally, “worldwide” is universally understood.
Webb though is by default misunderstood (web instead of webb).
So you would have to say “worldwide webb with two b”. Not optimal.
On top of that Webb is the last name of the founder: Thomas Webb.
It’s good that our talented and driven founder gets the recognition and respect he deserves. But having this in the project name might do more bad than good.
Imagine how fucked up Facebook would have been if it was called Zuckerberg book (deeply sorry for this comparaison Thomas lol).
For example, it gives the illusion to noobs that it could be a one man project.
If anything happens to Thomas, or if thomas get framed, that will also provide a single point of attack for competitors/press with easy headlines. “Mr. Webb , founder of worlwide Webb did XYZ.”
I think “3” has caught on with people and the community. “WWW3” is generally being used by the community and integrating projects on Twitter. Orally, people refer to us as Web3 in short. So, Worldwide Webb3 is the best that does justice to both.
I would go with Worldwide Web3, without another b, but our logo has two b and it may confuse people with the web3 internet. To accommodate this, I suggest using 3, like it would be used in a cube function i.e. WorldWide Webb^3.
Another project “Syn City” got caught up in a fiasco with Frank Miller because of his Sin City movie. Getting caught up in it a lose-lose even if one wins because of the time and resources. Legal people will know better.
I personally like the logo, and believe the game should remain Worldwide Webb.
No 3 anywhere.
It is associated with web3.0 development, but there are clearly already version 1,2 and 3 of web.
While the Webb is unique movement which happens to be happening in Web3.
Imagine, what if Thomas Webb and his team will stick with us up until Web4.0?
Will we be renaming it to Webb4? I’d rather have it as Worldwide Webb until the day no one will be questioning whether there should be one b or two.